EasyJet flight diverts to Rome over power bank in luggage

19 hours ago  ·  5 min read
By Thomas Johnson
9dd6a456-f301-47d9-ab6e-9c006cb4f53e-0

EasyJet Flight Diverts to Rome Over Power Bank in Luggage

Unexpected Landing Due to Charging Device

EasyJet flight diverts to Rome over –

An EasyJet flight bound for the UK was forced to land in Rome on Tuesday evening after a power bank was discovered charging in the aircraft’s cargo hold, according to recent reports. The Airbus A320, flight EZY2618, departed from Hurghada, Egypt, and was en route to London Luton when the crew decided to divert to the Italian capital as a precautionary measure. The decision came after a passenger reported the portable charger was located in the hold during the flight.

FlightRadar24 data indicates the aircraft was cruising at an altitude of 36,000 feet when it suddenly veered left over the Adriatic Sea, descending to Rome Fiumicino Airport just 20 minutes later. While the power bank itself was not malfunctioning, aviation authorities emphasize that lithium-ion batteries are prohibited from charging in the hold due to their potential to overheat or ignite. This incident underscores the strict protocols airlines have implemented to mitigate such risks.

EasyJet confirmed the diversion was necessary to ensure passenger safety. A spokesperson stated, “The aircraft landed safely, and passengers disembarked without incident. We provided hotel accommodation and meals where available, and additional refreshments were offered to those who remained at the airport.” The statement also reiterated the airline’s commitment to safety, noting that all operations adhere to manufacturer guidelines and regulatory standards.

The company apologized for the inconvenience caused, with the spokesperson adding, “We would like to express our regret for any disruption experienced by passengers due to the diversion and the resulting delay.” This incident highlights the ongoing vigilance required in managing lithium-ion battery risks, particularly in the confined space of an aircraft hold.

Power Bank Regulations Across Airlines

EasyJet’s policy on power banks is part of a broader trend among airlines to tighten restrictions on these devices. According to the airline’s guidelines, power banks must be carried in cabin baggage only and are not permitted to charge other electronics during the flight. Additionally, a maximum of two power banks per passenger is allowed, provided they do not exceed 160 Watt-hours (Wh) for lithium-ion batteries. Each device must be individually protected, such as in its original packaging or a plastic bag, to prevent accidental short circuits.

Other carriers have adopted similar rules to minimize fire hazards. Ryanair, for example, prohibits power banks from being placed in checked luggage or overhead compartments. The airline also bans their use to charge or power other devices during critical phases of flight, including taxiing, takeoff, and landing. British Airways takes a slightly different approach, allowing power banks up to 100Wh to be stored in seat pockets or bags beneath the seat in front. However, they restrict the use of onboard plug sockets for charging these devices.

These regulations are based on the inherent dangers of lithium-ion batteries, which can combust if exposed to excessive heat or physical damage. In the hold, where temperatures and pressure can fluctuate, the risk of a fire spreading is heightened. Airlines have increasingly emphasized the need for passengers to follow these rules, often broadcasting reminders via cabin announcements.

Global Incidents and Regulatory Shifts

The incident on EasyJet’s flight is part of a growing number of cases linked to lithium-ion battery failures. In November 2025, a man suffered burns to his leg and fingers after a power bank in his pocket ignited at Melbourne International Airport, causing a fire that forced emergency evacuation. Similarly, in January 2025, a portable power bank was identified as the likely cause of a plane fire in South Korea, which resulted in three minor injuries.

These events prompted the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), a UN agency, to introduce updated guidelines for power banks in March. The rules now require airlines to implement stricter measures, including limiting the number of power banks allowed on board and ensuring they are not used to charge other devices during takeoff, landing, or in the hold. The ICAO’s recommendations aim to standardize safety protocols across global carriers and reduce the likelihood of such incidents.

Experts warn that lithium-ion batteries, commonly found in power banks, can pose significant risks when not properly managed. The batteries may overheat due to manufacturing defects, physical damage, or electrical issues, especially in high-altitude environments. In the cabin, where temperatures are more stable and fires can be quickly contained, the danger is lower compared to the hold. However, the potential for rapid spread remains a concern.

Airlines have responded to these risks by revising their policies. For instance, EasyJet now requires power banks to be stored in hand luggage and prohibits their use for charging other devices during the flight. This aligns with the general consensus that the hold is a more hazardous location for such batteries. Passengers are often advised to keep power banks in their carry-on bags and avoid leaving them unattended in the cargo area.

Impact on Travel and Passenger Behavior

The incident has sparked renewed discussions about the balance between convenience and safety in air travel. Power banks are essential for many passengers, particularly on long-haul flights, but their improper placement can lead to unexpected diversions. EasyJet’s actions have reinforced the importance of adhering to these regulations, even for minor infractions.

Passengers who rely on power banks for charging devices during flights may need to adjust their habits. For example, carrying two power banks in hand luggage is now a common requirement, and ensuring they are individually wrapped or stored in a protective case is critical. Airlines also emphasize that using a power bank to charge another device during takeoff or landing could trigger an emergency response.

While the power bank in question was not faulty, the incident serves as a reminder of how quickly a small oversight can escalate into a major safety concern. The diversion to Rome, though brief, disrupted the flight schedule and required passengers to spend an additional day at the airport. Some travelers were accommodated with meals and overnight stays, while others received refreshments during the delay.

Industry officials note that such incidents are rare but underscore the need for strict enforcement of regulations. They also highlight that advancements in battery technology have improved safety, but the potential for failure remains. As a result, airlines continue to update their policies and educate passengers on proper handling of power banks.

The EasyJet case exemplifies the global effort to prevent lithium-ion battery-related accidents. By prioritizing safety over convenience, airlines aim to protect passengers and crew while maintaining the reliability of air travel. As power banks become more ubiquitous, their role in aviation safety will remain a topic of ongoing scrutiny and adaptation.

MORE FROM THIS CATEGORY